<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1588 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293831</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding product development expenses in foreign currency for Assessment Year 2001-02 was dismissed. The Assessing Officer&#039;s reopening of assessment for AY 2001-02 and 2002-03 was upheld. Expenses exclusion from export turnover varied across different assessment years, with some upheld and others dismissed. Foreign travel expenses for AY 2001-02 were remanded, while those for AY 2002-03 were upheld. The disallowance of exchange fluctuation loss for AY 2004-05 was dismissed. Amortization expenses for AY 2004-05 and 2005-06 were remanded for further investigation. The outcome resulted in mixed decisions favoring both the assessee and the Revenue across different assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 12:52:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1588 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293831</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding product development expenses in foreign currency for Assessment Year 2001-02 was dismissed. The Assessing Officer&#039;s reopening of assessment for AY 2001-02 and 2002-03 was upheld. Expenses exclusion from export turnover varied across different assessment years, with some upheld and others dismissed. Foreign travel expenses for AY 2001-02 were remanded, while those for AY 2002-03 were upheld. The disallowance of exchange fluctuation loss for AY 2004-05 was dismissed. Amortization expenses for AY 2004-05 and 2005-06 were remanded for further investigation. The outcome resulted in mixed decisions favoring both the assessee and the Revenue across different assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>