<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Section 18 Acknowledgment Does Not Extend Limitation for CIRP; Tribunal Can&#039;t Admit Late Bank Application.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56997</link>
    <description>Initiation of CIRP - Period of limitation - NPA - it appears that the bank had asserted, the bar of limitation did not apply as the corporate debtor had made acknowledgments in its balance-sheets, acknowledgments as in section 18 of the Limitation Act, for the period of limitation being extended - The court is convinced that the mandate of the Limitation Act is for dismissal of, inter alia, an application such as the bank&#039;s, on having been brought more than three years after right to sue accrued. The Tribunal, on the facts, lacked jurisdiction to admit it. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 12:32:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 12:32:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Section 18 Acknowledgment Does Not Extend Limitation for CIRP; Tribunal Can&#039;t Admit Late Bank Application.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56997</link>
      <description>Initiation of CIRP - Period of limitation - NPA - it appears that the bank had asserted, the bar of limitation did not apply as the corporate debtor had made acknowledgments in its balance-sheets, acknowledgments as in section 18 of the Limitation Act, for the period of limitation being extended - The court is convinced that the mandate of the Limitation Act is for dismissal of, inter alia, an application such as the bank&#039;s, on having been brought more than three years after right to sue accrued. The Tribunal, on the facts, lacked jurisdiction to admit it. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 12:32:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>