https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404803 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is not barred by the mere availability of an alternate statutory remedy, and delay in filing beyond the appeal period does not create an absolute prohibition on consideration where unfairness, lack of jurisdiction, perversity, or breach of natural justice is shown. In the tax reassessment context, disputed defects requiring factual verification and records not called for by the authority justified fresh adjudication; the assessment on those items was therefore set aside and remanded for reconsideration after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce records and be heard. en-us Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404803 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is not barred by the mere availability of an alternate statutory remedy, and delay in filing beyond the appeal period does not create an absolute prohibition on consideration where unfairness, lack of jurisdiction, perversity, or breach of natural justice is shown. In the tax reassessment context, disputed defects requiring factual verification and records not called for by the authority justified fresh adjudication; the assessment on those items was therefore set aside and remanded for reconsideration after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce records and be heard. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404803