<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 128 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404800</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the impugned endorsement by the first respondent, ruling that the rejection of the appeal without reasons violated principles of natural justice. The Court directed the first respondent to reconsider the appeal, emphasizing the importance of providing reasons and considering all relevant material before making a decision. The case highlighted the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice in administrative proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 128 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404800</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the impugned endorsement by the first respondent, ruling that the rejection of the appeal without reasons violated principles of natural justice. The Court directed the first respondent to reconsider the appeal, emphasizing the importance of providing reasons and considering all relevant material before making a decision. The case highlighted the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice in administrative proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>