<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 126 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404798</link>
    <description>Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to an application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, so the filing must be made within three years from the date the right to apply accrues, ordinarily the date of default. If the application is filed after that period, section 3 of the Limitation Act requires rejection unless delay is validly condoned on the facts. The text also notes that alleged acknowledgments in balance-sheets do not override the limitation bar, and a tribunal cannot admit a time-barred insolvency application in disregard of that mandate. On the stated facts, the admission order and consequential liquidation order could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 126 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404798</link>
      <description>Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to an application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, so the filing must be made within three years from the date the right to apply accrues, ordinarily the date of default. If the application is filed after that period, section 3 of the Limitation Act requires rejection unless delay is validly condoned on the facts. The text also notes that alleged acknowledgments in balance-sheets do not override the limitation bar, and a tribunal cannot admit a time-barred insolvency application in disregard of that mandate. On the stated facts, the admission order and consequential liquidation order could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>