<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 102 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404774</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for stay of the order, emphasizing compliance with procedural rules and relevant provisions of the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment highlighted the significance of circulars issued by the Board in determining actions during appeal pendency, stating no coercive action could be taken during this period. The appellant was allowed to approach the Tribunal when a cause of action arises in the future.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 08:25:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 102 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404774</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for stay of the order, emphasizing compliance with procedural rules and relevant provisions of the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment highlighted the significance of circulars issued by the Board in determining actions during appeal pendency, stating no coercive action could be taken during this period. The appellant was allowed to approach the Tribunal when a cause of action arises in the future.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>