<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1413 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293809</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the matter back to a different CIT(A) for a fresh decision due to concerns regarding the same person passing both the assessment and impugned orders. The assessee&#039;s delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was heard on its merits. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair opportunity of hearing and cooperation for the prompt resolution of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 08:23:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1413 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293809</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the matter back to a different CIT(A) for a fresh decision due to concerns regarding the same person passing both the assessment and impugned orders. The assessee&#039;s delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was heard on its merits. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair opportunity of hearing and cooperation for the prompt resolution of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>