<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 550 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293802</link>
    <description>The SC held two state officials in contempt for willfully disobeying its orders by granting unauthorized permissions to operate saw mills. Despite claims of bona fide actions, the Court found mens rea and manipulation of records. Unconditional apologies were rejected, and both contemnors received one-month simple imprisonment to uphold judicial authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 550 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293802</link>
      <description>The SC held two state officials in contempt for willfully disobeying its orders by granting unauthorized permissions to operate saw mills. Despite claims of bona fide actions, the Court found mens rea and manipulation of records. Unconditional apologies were rejected, and both contemnors received one-month simple imprisonment to uphold judicial authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>