<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 84 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404756</link>
    <description>The Court found that the challenge to the order of adjudication was not barred by the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962. It acknowledged the jurisdictional and natural justice issues raised by the petitioner and deemed a detailed hearing necessary. The Court directed the filing of affidavits within specified timelines, indicating a thorough examination of the case to address the complexities involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 10:52:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 84 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404756</link>
      <description>The Court found that the challenge to the order of adjudication was not barred by the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962. It acknowledged the jurisdictional and natural justice issues raised by the petitioner and deemed a detailed hearing necessary. The Court directed the filing of affidavits within specified timelines, indicating a thorough examination of the case to address the complexities involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>