<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 80 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404752</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the Single Judge&#039;s order, allowing the appeal and reinstating the applicability of Section 206AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to individuals below the taxable income limit. The Court emphasized that hardship and equity are irrelevant in tax law interpretation, focusing instead on legislative competence and fundamental rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 80 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404752</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the Single Judge&#039;s order, allowing the appeal and reinstating the applicability of Section 206AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to individuals below the taxable income limit. The Court emphasized that hardship and equity are irrelevant in tax law interpretation, focusing instead on legislative competence and fundamental rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>