<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 72 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404744</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remanding the issue to the AO for verification and reconsideration. The Tribunal held that the AO should have considered the documents filed by the assessee before disallowing the deduction u/s. 80IC. The ex-parte order of the CIT(A) was deemed inappropriate, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, with the judgment pronounced on 22nd February 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 10:51:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 72 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404744</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remanding the issue to the AO for verification and reconsideration. The Tribunal held that the AO should have considered the documents filed by the assessee before disallowing the deduction u/s. 80IC. The ex-parte order of the CIT(A) was deemed inappropriate, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, with the judgment pronounced on 22nd February 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>