<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 69 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing the re-computation of the Arms Length Price (ALP) by excluding certain comparables and ensuring consistency with previous rulings. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering segmental results and appropriate comparables for ALP determination, resulting in adjustments to working capital and the selection/rejection of comparable companies to accurately benchmark the assessee&#039;s international transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 10:51:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 69 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing the re-computation of the Arms Length Price (ALP) by excluding certain comparables and ensuring consistency with previous rulings. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering segmental results and appropriate comparables for ALP determination, resulting in adjustments to working capital and the selection/rejection of comparable companies to accurately benchmark the assessee&#039;s international transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>