<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1912 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293778</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to delete the disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. It was found that the borrowed funds were used for business purposes, and investments were made from the assessee&#039;s own funds. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds for the investments, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 10:38:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1912 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293778</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to delete the disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. It was found that the borrowed funds were used for business purposes, and investments were made from the assessee&#039;s own funds. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds for the investments, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>