<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2795 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293788</link>
    <description>Where leave to defend is granted subject to a condition of deposit, failure to comply with that condition entitles the plaintiff to rely on the earlier leave order and seek a decree on the plaint. Here, the defendant did not deposit the specified sum within time, and a certificate of non-deposit was produced. On that basis, the suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiff.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 10:38:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2795 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293788</link>
      <description>Where leave to defend is granted subject to a condition of deposit, failure to comply with that condition entitles the plaintiff to rely on the earlier leave order and seek a decree on the plaint. Here, the defendant did not deposit the specified sum within time, and a certificate of non-deposit was produced. On that basis, the suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiff.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>