https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293792 Stocking and selling drugs without a valid licence, together with failure to disclose the supplier's name, sustained conviction where the respondent's own admissions showed purchase and continued operation of the medical shop without licence. The High Court should not have disturbed concurrent findings of fact in revisional jurisdiction absent perversity or ignored material evidence, and the objection to carbon copies did not defeat the prosecution case. The conviction was restored under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. On sentence, the statutory minimum was reduced because adequate and special reasons existed, including the age of the incident, no prior conviction, and the respondent's claimed lack of awareness of the licensing requirement; imprisonment was reduced to three months while the fine was maintained. en-us Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Mar 2021 10:38:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293792 Stocking and selling drugs without a valid licence, together with failure to disclose the supplier's name, sustained conviction where the respondent's own admissions showed purchase and continued operation of the medical shop without licence. The High Court should not have disturbed concurrent findings of fact in revisional jurisdiction absent perversity or ignored material evidence, and the objection to carbon copies did not defeat the prosecution case. The conviction was restored under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. On sentence, the statutory minimum was reduced because adequate and special reasons existed, including the age of the incident, no prior conviction, and the respondent's claimed lack of awareness of the licensing requirement; imprisonment was reduced to three months while the fine was maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293792