https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293793 Section 24 of the 2013 Act was construed as a transitional provision that triggers lapse only where, for the relevant five-year period, neither possession has been taken nor compensation has been paid. "Paid" was read as tender of compensation under the 1894 Act and not as deposit in court; the proviso was treated as part of Section 24(2). Drawing a panchnama was accepted as a valid mode of taking possession for acquired land, and such possession vests title in the State. The period covered by an operative interim court order must be excluded from the five-year computation, and Section 24 does not revive stale, barred, or concluded claims. en-us Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293793 Section 24 of the 2013 Act was construed as a transitional provision that triggers lapse only where, for the relevant five-year period, neither possession has been taken nor compensation has been paid. "Paid" was read as tender of compensation under the 1894 Act and not as deposit in court; the proviso was treated as part of Section 24(2). Drawing a panchnama was accepted as a valid mode of taking possession for acquired land, and such possession vests title in the State. The period covered by an operative interim court order must be excluded from the five-year computation, and Section 24 does not revive stale, barred, or concluded claims. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293793