<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 443 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293774</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the order appointing an ad hoc committee, ruling the Registrar lacked authority under the M.P. Societies Registrikaran Adhiniyam Act, 1973. It held that the order was passed without affording elected members a hearing, deeming it procedurally flawed. The petition was granted, costs of Rs. 1,000 were awarded against the individual who issued the order, and the elected body was reinstated for its full term, minus the time it was excluded from office.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 10:09:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 443 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293774</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the order appointing an ad hoc committee, ruling the Registrar lacked authority under the M.P. Societies Registrikaran Adhiniyam Act, 1973. It held that the order was passed without affording elected members a hearing, deeming it procedurally flawed. The petition was granted, costs of Rs. 1,000 were awarded against the individual who issued the order, and the elected body was reinstated for its full term, minus the time it was excluded from office.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>