<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 844 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293770</link>
    <description>Revisional jurisdiction is supervisory and should not be used to disturb concurrent findings on identification unless there is a glaring legal error or miscarriage of justice. An illegality in search does not, by itself, invalidate a seizure or the prosecution case; the seized material remains assessable on the evidence. Under the cow slaughter prohibition discussed, conviction does not require proof that the accused owned or consciously possessed the premises where slaughter occurred, because the offence is complete upon proof of slaughter in violation of the statutory ban, subject only to unproved exceptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 16:52:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 844 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293770</link>
      <description>Revisional jurisdiction is supervisory and should not be used to disturb concurrent findings on identification unless there is a glaring legal error or miscarriage of justice. An illegality in search does not, by itself, invalidate a seizure or the prosecution case; the seized material remains assessable on the evidence. Under the cow slaughter prohibition discussed, conviction does not require proof that the accused owned or consciously possessed the premises where slaughter occurred, because the offence is complete upon proof of slaughter in violation of the statutory ban, subject only to unproved exceptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>