<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 61 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404733</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the rejection orders for refund applications under the Goods and Service Tax Act, citing violations of natural justice principles. It directed authorities to provide the petitioner with opportunities for personal hearings and filing detailed replies within specified timelines. The decision emphasized procedural fairness and the right to be heard, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s submissions are duly considered before making refund decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2021 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 61 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404733</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the rejection orders for refund applications under the Goods and Service Tax Act, citing violations of natural justice principles. It directed authorities to provide the petitioner with opportunities for personal hearings and filing detailed replies within specified timelines. The decision emphasized procedural fairness and the right to be heard, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s submissions are duly considered before making refund decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>