<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (6) TMI 24 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24780</link>
    <description>Revisional jurisdiction under section 35 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income-tax Act cannot be used where no assessment exists in the hands of the person properly chargeable; in such a situation, the appropriate course is reassessment of escaped income. The statutory fiction in section 30(2) and its Explanation applies only to crop harvested but not disposed of before partition and cannot be extended beyond its express limits. Coffee crop supplied to the Coffee Board before partition was treated as already disposed of, so later back pool payments could not sustain assessment in the hands of the erstwhile Hindu undivided family.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:21:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (6) TMI 24 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24780</link>
      <description>Revisional jurisdiction under section 35 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income-tax Act cannot be used where no assessment exists in the hands of the person properly chargeable; in such a situation, the appropriate course is reassessment of escaped income. The statutory fiction in section 30(2) and its Explanation applies only to crop harvested but not disposed of before partition and cannot be extended beyond its express limits. Coffee crop supplied to the Coffee Board before partition was treated as already disposed of, so later back pool payments could not sustain assessment in the hands of the erstwhile Hindu undivided family.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>