<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 49 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the issue for fresh consideration by the AO. The dispute centered on whether a sum received as share application money should be treated as unexplained credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal admitted additional evidence indicating no actual payment but only a book entry, emphasizing the need to establish the transaction&#039;s nature to determine the classification of the disputed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 08:19:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 49 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the issue for fresh consideration by the AO. The dispute centered on whether a sum received as share application money should be treated as unexplained credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal admitted additional evidence indicating no actual payment but only a book entry, emphasizing the need to establish the transaction&#039;s nature to determine the classification of the disputed amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>