<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 42 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404714</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee for three assessment years (2010-11, 2011-12, and 2012-13), holding that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was unjustified due to the invalidity of the penalty notice. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty, citing inconsistency with previous judgments and emphasizing the necessity of a clear and unambiguous penalty notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 08:18:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 42 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404714</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee for three assessment years (2010-11, 2011-12, and 2012-13), holding that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was unjustified due to the invalidity of the penalty notice. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty, citing inconsistency with previous judgments and emphasizing the necessity of a clear and unambiguous penalty notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>