<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 34 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404706</link>
    <description>The Appellate Board&#039;s use of its correction power was upheld where the earlier order was said to contain an accidental slip and an internal inconsistency about receipt of the amount. The Court noted that the correction followed hearing both sides, and that there was no further material to displace the Board&#039;s conclusion. On that basis, the correction made to the earlier order was left undisturbed and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 34 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404706</link>
      <description>The Appellate Board&#039;s use of its correction power was upheld where the earlier order was said to contain an accidental slip and an internal inconsistency about receipt of the amount. The Court noted that the correction followed hearing both sides, and that there was no further material to displace the Board&#039;s conclusion. On that basis, the correction made to the earlier order was left undisturbed and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>