<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 29 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404701</link>
    <description>The court set aside the clarificatory order, assessment orders, and revisional orders, remanding the matter for fresh consideration by the Deputy Commissioner of Taxes. Each party was to bear its own costs, and the writ petition was allowed to this extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 08:17:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 29 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404701</link>
      <description>The court set aside the clarificatory order, assessment orders, and revisional orders, remanding the matter for fresh consideration by the Deputy Commissioner of Taxes. Each party was to bear its own costs, and the writ petition was allowed to this extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>