<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 26 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404698</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in New Delhi allowed the appeal, quashed the order, and directed the Respondent to defreeze the Corporate Debtor&#039;s account. The Tribunal upheld the supremacy of the I&amp;amp;B Code, emphasizing the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s obligation to provide relief within the legal framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 08:17:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 26 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404698</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in New Delhi allowed the appeal, quashed the order, and directed the Respondent to defreeze the Corporate Debtor&#039;s account. The Tribunal upheld the supremacy of the I&amp;amp;B Code, emphasizing the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s obligation to provide relief within the legal framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>