<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (5) TMI 27 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24776</link>
    <description>Interest paid for delayed non-payment of purchase tax under the U.P. Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Act, 1961 was treated as compensatory rather than penal in nature. Applying the Supreme Court principle on interest under sugarcane cess legislation, the amount was therefore held to be an admissible deduction for income-tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:33:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (5) TMI 27 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24776</link>
      <description>Interest paid for delayed non-payment of purchase tax under the U.P. Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Act, 1961 was treated as compensatory rather than penal in nature. Applying the Supreme Court principle on interest under sugarcane cess legislation, the amount was therefore held to be an admissible deduction for income-tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>