https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293766 The court ordered the release of detained goods and seized vehicles in two connected cases. In the first case, the petitioner challenged the detention of goods due to a mismatched vehicle number on the e-way bill, with the court ordering release upon furnishing a bank guarantee. In the second case, demands for security and tax penalty were found to have discrepancies, leading to the release of goods upon providing a bank guarantee. The court emphasized compliance with the GST Act and resolved the issues by requiring bank guarantees, resulting in the release of the goods and seized vehicle. en-us Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:03:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293766 The court ordered the release of detained goods and seized vehicles in two connected cases. In the first case, the petitioner challenged the detention of goods due to a mismatched vehicle number on the e-way bill, with the court ordering release upon furnishing a bank guarantee. In the second case, demands for security and tax penalty were found to have discrepancies, leading to the release of goods upon providing a bank guarantee. The court emphasized compliance with the GST Act and resolved the issues by requiring bank guarantees, resulting in the release of the goods and seized vehicle. Case-Laws GST Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293766