https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293767 The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking disciplinary action against respondent No.3 for alleged document manipulation. The Court found the petitioner, a retired engineer, lacked standing to initiate proceedings post-retirement. It noted the documents were verified by the Board, deemed genuine, and accepted during respondent No.3's service without objection. Emphasizing the absence of legal basis and hinting at personal vendetta, the Court ruled in favor of respondent No.3, imposing a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the petitioner and returning original records to respondent No.1. en-us Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:03:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293767 The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking disciplinary action against respondent No.3 for alleged document manipulation. The Court found the petitioner, a retired engineer, lacked standing to initiate proceedings post-retirement. It noted the documents were verified by the Board, deemed genuine, and accepted during respondent No.3's service without objection. Emphasizing the absence of legal basis and hinting at personal vendetta, the Court ruled in favor of respondent No.3, imposing a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the petitioner and returning original records to respondent No.1. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293767