<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 22 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404694</link>
    <description>The impugned orders passed by CIT(A)-1 Noida were set aside due to jurisdictional defects, being passed after his compulsory retirement when he was functus officio. The appeals were remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with the law, emphasizing the importance of jurisdictional authority and procedural compliance in the administration of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 22 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404694</link>
      <description>The impugned orders passed by CIT(A)-1 Noida were set aside due to jurisdictional defects, being passed after his compulsory retirement when he was functus officio. The appeals were remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with the law, emphasizing the importance of jurisdictional authority and procedural compliance in the administration of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>