<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 15 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404687</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) to restrict the addition to 12.5% of alleged bogus purchases, estimating the profit element. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, confirming the decision to tax only the profit element in such purchases. The order provided partial relief to the assessee, with the Tribunal finding no issues with the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s approach based on judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 15 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404687</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) to restrict the addition to 12.5% of alleged bogus purchases, estimating the profit element. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, confirming the decision to tax only the profit element in such purchases. The order provided partial relief to the assessee, with the Tribunal finding no issues with the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s approach based on judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>