<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 13 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404685</link>
    <description>The Court held that the bar of alternative remedy does not apply when challenging an appealable order based on jurisdictional and natural justice grounds. The Court directed the respondent to file an affidavit-in-opposition within four weeks, with the petitioner allowed to respond within two weeks thereafter. The case was scheduled for a hearing after eight weeks for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 13 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404685</link>
      <description>The Court held that the bar of alternative remedy does not apply when challenging an appealable order based on jurisdictional and natural justice grounds. The Court directed the respondent to file an affidavit-in-opposition within four weeks, with the petitioner allowed to respond within two weeks thereafter. The case was scheduled for a hearing after eight weeks for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>