<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 10 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404682</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the order of the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, ruling in favor of the appellant on the substantial questions of law. The court found that the Additional Commissioner failed to establish that the order by the Joint Commissioner was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests, leading to the setting aside of the Additional Commissioner&#039;s order. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the appellant succeeded in challenging the revision of the assessment orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 10 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404682</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the order of the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, ruling in favor of the appellant on the substantial questions of law. The court found that the Additional Commissioner failed to establish that the order by the Joint Commissioner was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests, leading to the setting aside of the Additional Commissioner&#039;s order. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the appellant succeeded in challenging the revision of the assessment orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>