<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 6 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404678</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that a loan liability cannot be considered income. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the bank loan amount from the tax assessment, highlighting that the loan should not be taxed as undisclosed investment or unexplained money under sections 69A and 69B of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2021 21:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 6 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404678</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that a loan liability cannot be considered income. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the bank loan amount from the tax assessment, highlighting that the loan should not be taxed as undisclosed investment or unexplained money under sections 69A and 69B of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>