<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1168 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293757</link>
    <description>Interim relief was granted for release of seized goods because related special leave petitions had already been dealt with on the same basis. The SC applied the principle of parity and consistency in interim orders, holding that similarly placed petitioners should receive identical treatment. The applications were allowed, and the goods were ordered to be released on the same terms and conditions as in the other cases where release had already been directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 10:22:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1168 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293757</link>
      <description>Interim relief was granted for release of seized goods because related special leave petitions had already been dealt with on the same basis. The SC applied the principle of parity and consistency in interim orders, holding that similarly placed petitioners should receive identical treatment. The applications were allowed, and the goods were ordered to be released on the same terms and conditions as in the other cases where release had already been directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>