<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1750 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, (NCR BENCH) NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293754</link>
    <description>Intra-group support, coordination, advisory and back-office services were not taxable in India as fees for technical services under the India-UK DTAA because they did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes, nor involve transfer of a technical plan or design. The applicant also had no permanent establishment in India, so the receipts were not taxable as business income. As the underlying payment was not chargeable to tax in India, the statutory trigger for withholding under section 195 did not arise, and no tax deduction at source was required from the Indian payer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1750 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, (NCR BENCH) NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293754</link>
      <description>Intra-group support, coordination, advisory and back-office services were not taxable in India as fees for technical services under the India-UK DTAA because they did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes, nor involve transfer of a technical plan or design. The applicant also had no permanent establishment in India, so the receipts were not taxable as business income. As the underlying payment was not chargeable to tax in India, the statutory trigger for withholding under section 195 did not arise, and no tax deduction at source was required from the Indian payer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>