<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>No Penalty for Minor Discrepancy in 26AS Form; Taxpayer&#039;s Conduct Not Contumacious, Section 271(1)(c) Inapplicable.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56942</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is small difference between 26AS and income returned. This is also very minor and the assessee does not deserve to be visited with the rigour of penalty. We are of the considered opinion that assessee&#039;s conduct is not contumacious and his claims are not mala fide. Hence, assessee should not be visited with rigour of penalty - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:14:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:14:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>No Penalty for Minor Discrepancy in 26AS Form; Taxpayer&#039;s Conduct Not Contumacious, Section 271(1)(c) Inapplicable.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56942</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is small difference between 26AS and income returned. This is also very minor and the assessee does not deserve to be visited with the rigour of penalty. We are of the considered opinion that assessee&#039;s conduct is not contumacious and his claims are not mala fide. Hence, assessee should not be visited with rigour of penalty - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:14:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>