https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404665 For enforcement of a foreign award, territorial jurisdiction turns on the relief granted by the award, not on the underlying contract dispute. The Court treated the partial award as a money award because it directed payment of quantified sums with a consequential obligation to return title documents. On that basis, jurisdiction depended on the location of the judgment debtor's attachable assets, and the petitioner's uncontroverted assertions that the respondent had assets, offices, and bank accounts in Delhi were sufficient. Pending insolvency proceedings against another respondent did not affect the jurisdictional analysis at that stage because enforcement was not being pursued against that respondent. en-us Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404665 For enforcement of a foreign award, territorial jurisdiction turns on the relief granted by the award, not on the underlying contract dispute. The Court treated the partial award as a money award because it directed payment of quantified sums with a consequential obligation to return title documents. On that basis, jurisdiction depended on the location of the judgment debtor's attachable assets, and the petitioner's uncontroverted assertions that the respondent had assets, offices, and bank accounts in Delhi were sufficient. Pending insolvency proceedings against another respondent did not affect the jurisdictional analysis at that stage because enforcement was not being pursued against that respondent. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404665