<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1157 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404665</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court had territorial jurisdiction to entertain a petition for enforcement of a partial money award. The court determined that the relief granted by the Arbitral Tribunal was a money award, not specific performance. The court also noted that the moratorium imposed by the NCLT was irrelevant at that stage. The court directed the respondent to file an affidavit of its assets and listed the petition for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1157 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404665</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court had territorial jurisdiction to entertain a petition for enforcement of a partial money award. The court determined that the relief granted by the Arbitral Tribunal was a money award, not specific performance. The court also noted that the moratorium imposed by the NCLT was irrelevant at that stage. The court directed the respondent to file an affidavit of its assets and listed the petition for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>