<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1153 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404661</link>
    <description>The HC held that the Tribunal had disposed of the miscellaneous petition on an irrelevant depreciation issue instead of the actual grievance raised, showing improper application of mind to the real controversy. Because the order did not address the points requiring consideration, it was unsustainable and was set aside. The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration in accordance with law on the correct issues raised in the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2021 11:27:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1153 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404661</link>
      <description>The HC held that the Tribunal had disposed of the miscellaneous petition on an irrelevant depreciation issue instead of the actual grievance raised, showing improper application of mind to the real controversy. Because the order did not address the points requiring consideration, it was unsustainable and was set aside. The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration in accordance with law on the correct issues raised in the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>