<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1142 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404650</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a customs valuation case involving imported goods. It was found that a clerical error in undervaluing the goods was made by the shipper, not the appellant, who promptly rectified the discrepancy. The Tribunal determined no collusion between the parties and set aside the confiscation order and penalties imposed under the Customs Act, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1142 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404650</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a customs valuation case involving imported goods. It was found that a clerical error in undervaluing the goods was made by the shipper, not the appellant, who promptly rectified the discrepancy. The Tribunal determined no collusion between the parties and set aside the confiscation order and penalties imposed under the Customs Act, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>