https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293742 Prima facie territorial jurisdiction was treated as available for enforcement of a foreign award where the awarded money was situate or recoverable from the judgment debtor, and the objection based on Section 42 was declined. The Court held that the mere availability of time to challenge the award under the UNCITRAL Model Law did not bar interim protection or execution-related directions, and that objections under Section 48 had to be established by the resisting party before enforcement could be refused. On that basis, the Court granted interim asset disclosure and restrained dissipation of the specified property pending further proceedings. en-us Thu, 30 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Feb 2021 11:03:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293742 Prima facie territorial jurisdiction was treated as available for enforcement of a foreign award where the awarded money was situate or recoverable from the judgment debtor, and the objection based on Section 42 was declined. The Court held that the mere availability of time to challenge the award under the UNCITRAL Model Law did not bar interim protection or execution-related directions, and that objections under Section 48 had to be established by the resisting party before enforcement could be refused. On that basis, the Court granted interim asset disclosure and restrained dissipation of the specified property pending further proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293742