<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1749 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293743</link>
    <description>The court allowed the Writ Petition, directing the assessing officer to pass orders de novo within four weeks from the conclusion of the personal hearing, affording the petitioner a fair opportunity to present its case. The judgment emphasized the importance of a personal hearing and the right to raise objections in assessment proceedings. The decision highlighted the need for procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles in tax assessments under the Entry Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2021 11:03:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1749 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293743</link>
      <description>The court allowed the Writ Petition, directing the assessing officer to pass orders de novo within four weeks from the conclusion of the personal hearing, affording the petitioner a fair opportunity to present its case. The judgment emphasized the importance of a personal hearing and the right to raise objections in assessment proceedings. The decision highlighted the need for procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles in tax assessments under the Entry Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>