<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1860 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293747</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the High Court&#039;s decision, which upheld the Trial Court&#039;s dismissal of the plaintiff&#039;s claim for specific performance of a contract related to the suit land. Both lower courts had found that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform the contract, a crucial requirement for specific performance. The Supreme Court emphasized the discretionary nature of specific performance and upheld the lower courts&#039; findings, stating that there were no material perversities or illegalities warranting a review of the evidence. The appeal was therefore dismissed, affirming the decisions of the Trial Court and the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2021 11:03:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1860 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293747</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the High Court&#039;s decision, which upheld the Trial Court&#039;s dismissal of the plaintiff&#039;s claim for specific performance of a contract related to the suit land. Both lower courts had found that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform the contract, a crucial requirement for specific performance. The Supreme Court emphasized the discretionary nature of specific performance and upheld the lower courts&#039; findings, stating that there were no material perversities or illegalities warranting a review of the evidence. The appeal was therefore dismissed, affirming the decisions of the Trial Court and the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>