https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293729 Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is confined to landowners who did not seek a reference under Section 18; a claimant who already pursued a reference and an appeal in the High Court cannot invoke that provision for redetermination. The court also declined to permit belated payment of deficit court fee and reopening of the award after about six years and after finality had attached, holding that inherent powers could not be used to unsettle concluded proceedings or excuse deliberate restriction of the claim. The application was therefore rejected. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Feb 2021 10:19:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293729 Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is confined to landowners who did not seek a reference under Section 18; a claimant who already pursued a reference and an appeal in the High Court cannot invoke that provision for redetermination. The court also declined to permit belated payment of deficit court fee and reopening of the award after about six years and after finality had attached, holding that inherent powers could not be used to unsettle concluded proceedings or excuse deliberate restriction of the claim. The application was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293729