<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 391 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293727</link>
    <description>The High Court held territorial jurisdiction to enforce the foreign arbitral award due to the respondent&#039;s bank account being within its limits. The application under Section 34 pending in the Thane District Court was directed to be returned and re-presented to the High Court for disposal with the execution application. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order, and the court refused the appellant&#039;s request to stay the judgment for further legal recourse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:36:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 391 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293727</link>
      <description>The High Court held territorial jurisdiction to enforce the foreign arbitral award due to the respondent&#039;s bank account being within its limits. The application under Section 34 pending in the Thane District Court was directed to be returned and re-presented to the High Court for disposal with the execution application. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order, and the court refused the appellant&#039;s request to stay the judgment for further legal recourse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>