<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Rules Forest Dept Compensation as Business Expense, Not Asset Acquisition, Confirms Assessing Officer&#039;s Decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56925</link>
    <description>Nature of expenditure - compensation to the Forest Department on account of the decision of Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court - The AO admitted this fact that the amount paid was not for acquiring the new asset. - The said expenses are liable to be treated to be paid for business expenses.- AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:47:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:47:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Rules Forest Dept Compensation as Business Expense, Not Asset Acquisition, Confirms Assessing Officer&#039;s Decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56925</link>
      <description>Nature of expenditure - compensation to the Forest Department on account of the decision of Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court - The AO admitted this fact that the amount paid was not for acquiring the new asset. - The said expenses are liable to be treated to be paid for business expenses.- AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:47:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>