https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293724 The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of charges under sections 302 and 449 of the IPC for murder and house trespass, respectively. The Court found significant gaps in the prosecution's case, including insufficient circumstantial evidence, alleged suppression of vital evidence, lack of credible motive, questionable recovery of incriminating items, and unreliable witness testimonies. Criticizing the investigation's lapses, the Court concluded that the prosecution's case was based on suspicion and lacked credible evidence, leading to the appellant's acquittal and immediate release. en-us Mon, 09 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:42:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293724 The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of charges under sections 302 and 449 of the IPC for murder and house trespass, respectively. The Court found significant gaps in the prosecution's case, including insufficient circumstantial evidence, alleged suppression of vital evidence, lack of credible motive, questionable recovery of incriminating items, and unreliable witness testimonies. Criticizing the investigation's lapses, the Court concluded that the prosecution's case was based on suspicion and lacked credible evidence, leading to the appellant's acquittal and immediate release. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293724