https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293723 The City Civil Court at Calcutta had territorial jurisdiction to try a suit regarding ownership of shares, despite the defendant company's registered office being in Punjab. The court applied Order 14 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure to decide the jurisdiction issue as a preliminary matter. Emphasizing the concept of 'cause of action,' the court held that the plaintiff's purchase and non-receipt of shares in Calcutta constituted the cause of action, justifying jurisdiction in Calcutta. The court dismissed the revisional application, upholding its jurisdiction and citing the importance of Order 14 Rule 2 and 'cause of action' interpretation. en-us Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:46:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293723 The City Civil Court at Calcutta had territorial jurisdiction to try a suit regarding ownership of shares, despite the defendant company's registered office being in Punjab. The court applied Order 14 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure to decide the jurisdiction issue as a preliminary matter. Emphasizing the concept of 'cause of action,' the court held that the plaintiff's purchase and non-receipt of shares in Calcutta constituted the cause of action, justifying jurisdiction in Calcutta. The court dismissed the revisional application, upholding its jurisdiction and citing the importance of Order 14 Rule 2 and 'cause of action' interpretation. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293723