https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404624 The court upheld the conviction of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, sentencing him to six months of Simple Imprisonment and directing payment of compensation. Despite the petitioner's defense evidence, the court found him guilty based on evidence of cheque deposit, bouncing, and legal notice compliance. The court modified the sentence to the period already served in custody, imposed an additional fine of Rupees one lakh, and directed prompt payment of compensation and fine to the complainant, with non-compliance leading to serving the original sentence. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:44:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404624 The court upheld the conviction of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, sentencing him to six months of Simple Imprisonment and directing payment of compensation. Despite the petitioner's defense evidence, the court found him guilty based on evidence of cheque deposit, bouncing, and legal notice compliance. The court modified the sentence to the period already served in custody, imposed an additional fine of Rupees one lakh, and directed prompt payment of compensation and fine to the complainant, with non-compliance leading to serving the original sentence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404624