<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1112 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404620</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the subsequent re-assessment order prevailed over the previous one for the Assessment Year 2008-09. The court did not delve into the issues of re-opening assessment under section 147 or the applicability of section 153C of the Act, as the appeal against the subsequent order was pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:44:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1112 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404620</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the subsequent re-assessment order prevailed over the previous one for the Assessment Year 2008-09. The court did not delve into the issues of re-opening assessment under section 147 or the applicability of section 153C of the Act, as the appeal against the subsequent order was pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>