<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 7 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24754</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the accounts due to discrepancies in stock figures provided to the bank for overdraft purposes by the tile manufacturer. The Court emphasized the factual nature of the assessment and the sufficiency of material to support the rejection, ultimately ruling in favor of the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:23:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 7 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24754</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the accounts due to discrepancies in stock figures provided to the bank for overdraft purposes by the tile manufacturer. The Court emphasized the factual nature of the assessment and the sufficiency of material to support the rejection, ultimately ruling in favor of the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>